Impact of Climate Change: 2018

———————————————————————————————————————————————

16 November, 2018

One Man’s Discovery Sinks a Major Climate Study

posted by Deadman at 00:06 No comments:

Email This BlogThis!Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

labels: “climate change”, Bill Whittle, Climate Etc., Nicholas Lewis, the awarmist journal Nature errs again

Newer Posts Older Posts Home

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

CAGW—Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming—is a complete con, a fraudulent, pseudo-scientific scam.

“Faking Man-Made Global Warming” by Mann & Jones et Al.

▼ 2018 (1)
- ▼ November (1)
  - One Man’s Discovery Sinks a Major Climate Study

► 2017 (1)
- ► October (1)

► 2015 (1)
- ► October (1)

► 2014 (3)
- ► December (1)
- ► August (1)
- ► February (1)

► 2013 (5)
- ► October (1)
- ► May (2)
- ► April (1)
- ► March (1)

► 2012 (15)
- ► June (1)
- ► May (1)
- ► March (4)
- ► February (7)
- ► January (2)

► 2011 (75)
- ► December (5)
- ► November (10)
- ► October (2)
- ► September (3)
- ► August (1)
- ► July (5)
- ► June (7)
- ► May (6)
- ► April (26)
- ► March (10)

“The arrogance of global warming activists and their fellow travellers in politics is something I know well from the past. They wish to suppress truth, control the market, and dictate policy; and I, who have spent most of my time living under communism, feel obliged to warn against it.”—Dr. Václav Klaus

In a briefing paper for the Global Warming Policy Foundation, Andrew Turnbull outlines the manifold doubts, disputes and disagreements which exist about the IPCC’s key assumptions.
See: “The Really Inconvenient Truth, or ‘It Ain’t Necessarily So’.”

“There is no global temperature. The reasons lie in the properties of the equation of state governing local thermodynamic equilibrium, and the implications cannot be avoided by substituting statistics for physics.”
—Christopher Essex, Ross McKitrick & Bjarne Andresen in “Does Global Temperature Exist?”

Amazon.com Widgets

The Utility of Labours:
There’s none so learned, wise or true,
who cannot learn of something new:
experience and age will shew
that much you trow you do not know;
what seem foremost to be correct
on testing you’d perforce reject.
—Demea, in Terence, Adelphoe, 855-58.

Watts Up With That?

Hey Media, Remember in 2017 When an Iceberg in Antarctica Freaked You Out? Science now says: ‘Never Mind’
21 minutes ago
Had Enough Therapy?

Saturday Miscellany
1 hour ago
NoTricksZone

Another Climate Sensitivity Study Finds Doubling CO2 Leads To 0.5°C Warming At Most
1 day ago
Junk Science

3-Minute Junking: Prediabetes — Medicine or Marketing?
5 days ago
Climategate

Massive Cover-up Launched by U.K. Met Office to Hide its 103 Non-Existent Temperature Measuring Stations
1 week ago
♆ The Macho Response ♆

I.C.U.
3 months ago
Climate Audit

Reconstructing the Esper Reconstruction
6 months ago
No Frakking Consensus

What I’ve Been Up To
11 months ago
Errors in IPCC climate science

SOI retraces and No Vote historic huge Aussie verdict against Albo Gov
1 year ago
Australian Climate Madness

Australian State Bans Gas to New Homes
1 year ago
GlobalWarming.org

Kathleen and Charles Moore Prepare to take their Fight Against Taxing Unrealized Gains to Supreme Court
1 year ago
The Reference Frame

AdSense became unusable
2 years ago
Letters of Note

It is only a matter of time
4 years ago
ScienceBits

How Climate Change Pseudoscience Became Publicly Accepted
5 years ago
Shub Niggurath Climate

‘…when there is one overwhelming factor, you don’t have to worry the details…’
5 years ago
Planetary Vision

Express covered my video on fake manned space travel
5 years ago
Bishop Hill

Curiouser and curiouser
5 years ago
all right, all right

Rosebery Film Festival
5 years ago
World Climate Report

Hello world!
6 years ago
CFACT Europe

Tinder, die wohl angesagteste Dating-App
8 years ago
Popular Technology.net

Climate Change, Energy and the Environment Lectures
8 years ago
Climate Realists

Database Error
8 years ago
Climate Change Dispatch

Climate change: Chicken Littles, Yosemite Valley & ostriches
8 years ago
Climate Skeptic

Revisiting (Yet Again) Hansen’s 1998 Forecast on Global Warming to Congress
8 years ago
The Hockey Shtick

WSJ: It’s Always Exxon’s Fault- Why climate warriors keep returning to the same whipping boy
9 years ago
The Great Heritage Highway Walk

The New Website
9 years ago
Warning Signs

Obama's Middle East Debacle
9 years ago
Skeptic’s Corner

Global Warming: The Play-Doh theory
10 years ago
The Friends of Carbon Dioxide

The Stupid Anti-Carbon Tax is Gone!
10 years ago
ubi libertas ibi patria

Reducing Men to Marionettes
10 years ago
the Trichotomy of Politics

Hannan on the “Right-Wing” Label
10 years ago
Bunyipitude

The Bird has flown
11 years ago
Real Science

代理店募集をして販路を拡大
11 years ago
Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr.

Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!
11 years ago
An Honest Climate Debate

Global Warming Proof: Expansion of Antarctic sea ice
11 years ago
johnosullivan

Greenhouse Gas Errors Abound on WUWT Blog
11 years ago
Say “Yes” to More Taxes

Say “Yes” to Obama’s Green Jobs
12 years ago
EcoTretas

Viver do sol
12 years ago
The Unbearable Nakedness of Climate Change

Omniclimate- The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE is moving
12 years ago
Old Quadrant Online
The Global Warming Policy Foundation
Quadrant Online
All Models Are Wrong
Minding the Campus
William M. Briggs, Statistician to the Stars

The “Climategate” E-mails, with Analysis by John P. Costella
Nigel Calder, “Climate Change – Introduction”
Bob Carter: “An Inconvenient Fallacy”
Beverly K. Eakman: “Scientists Try to Have It Both Ways on Global-Warming”
Russell Cook: “The ’96 to present smear of skeptic scientists”
Alana Goodman: “Global Warming Activists Bully Scholastic-into Submission”
Pierre L. Gosselin, “129 Climate Scandals”
William M. Gray: “Gross Errors in the IPCC-AR4 Report Regarding Past & Future Changes in Global Tropical Cyclone Activity—A Noble Disgrace”
Kelvin Kemm: “Society being misled by proponents of human-induced climate change”
Mark Lynas: “Questions the IPCC Must Now Urgently Answer”
Walter Russell Mead: “The Failure of Al Gore, Part One”
Walter Russell Mead: “The Failure of Al Gore, Part Deux”
Patrick Michaels: “Peer Review and ‘Pal Review’ in Climate Science”
Melanie Phillips: “Frozen Con”
David Rothbard & Craig Rucker: “UN Climate of Desperation”
Lawrence Solomon: “97% Cooked Stats”
Anthony Watts: “Climate change hype – it’s turtles all the way down under”

Home
Alas for Alarmists, Alaska & Canada Cooler
“Fifty Million Climate Refugees by 2010”
Greenland Ice Core – Temperature Last 10,000 Years...
Labor’s ‘Carbon’ Tax Strategy
Losing the Debate?
Misc. Videos
More Strong to Violent Tornadoes?
No Stairs, No Commas, No Consistency
So Much for Arctic Ice Disappearing by 2009
Suspended for Denouncing Green Lies

Alfred’s Review
All Right, All Right
Thorfinn’s Review
Turn me on, Deadman

“An Inconsistent Truth” “An Inconvenient Truth” “climate change” “FrackNation” “Gasland” “How to Get Expelled from School” “Windfall” ABC Age UK AGW Al. Gore Jr. Alan Carlin Alan Moran American Thinker Amrutha Gayathri An Appeal to Reason Andrew Trounson another dud prediction Anthony Watts Antony Jay Global Warming Policy Foundation ANU Armageddon Australian Constitution Australian Government awarmism BBC biassed survey Big Government big tobacco Bill Kininmonth Bill Muehlenberg Bill Whittle Bishop Hill Bjørn Lomborg Bob Carter Brisbane’s water Canada carbon dioxide cause and effect Charles Anderson Chris Craigie Christopher Booker circular reasoning Claudius Ptolemaeus climate change Climate Change Act climate change debate Climate Commission Climate Etc. Climate Fears and Phobias Dissected Climate Lessons climate models wrong Climate Realists climate science ClimateCrisis.net climategate Collegio di Propaganda Fide Commonwealth DPP consensus conspiracy Cook et al. corrupt UN’s gravy train cosmic ray theory Crikey Criminal Code Act 1924 Criminal Code Act 1995 CRU CSIRO curriculum Daniel M. Sweger David Evans David Flint David Rose declining standards deforestACTION Department of Climate Change Des Moore Dilbert Documentary Dogbert Donna Laframboise Doug L. Hoffman Doug Lord Douglas J. Keenan Doyle Rice DPP droughts and floods Durban eco-fundamentalism economic reasoning Education Act 1994 Emma Alberici Encounter Broadsides environmental mitigation environmentalism EPA Erik M. Conway ETS Ezra Levant Faculty of Education film review financial failures Financial Post fossil fuels fracking fraud Freeman Dyson fudged numbers Galileo Galilei Gallup Garnaut Climate Change Review global sea level Global Warming Policy Foundation green energy technology greenhouse gas theory Greenland ice-sheet Greenpeace Greg Combet group-thinking H. Sterling Burnett Hannah Arendt Harold Camping hide the decline high school Howard Brady hydraulic fracturing hypocrisy Ian Chubb Ian Frazer Ian Plimer Immanuel Kant Imre Salusinszky indoctrination IPCC J.R. Houston James Delingpole Jo Nova John Barron John Brignell John Izzard John M. Ostrowski John Nicol John O’Sullivan John R Christy John Snow John Stokes Josh Fox Journal of Coastal Research Julia Gillard Kirk Myers Kyoto Labor’s ‘carbon’ tax lack of evidence lack of proof Lateline Laura Israel Lawrence Solomon Lesley Hughes liars lies list Lydia Saad Martin Fleischmann Mathew Trevisan Matt Ridley Merchants of Doubt Michael Crichton Michael E. Mann Michael Lewis Michael Marshall Michael Sandel Michelle Grattan Mike Haseler Miranda Devine MPCC music nail in coffin Naomi Oreskes NASA Nasif Nahle Nasif S. Nahle Nathan Bindoff National Association of Scholars New Pscientist New York Times Magazine New Zealand Newsweek Nicholas Lewis Nick Minchin Nicolas Nierenberg Nigel Lawson NOAA Noel Sheppard non-falsifiable hypothesis Norman Rogers not consensus not science NZ Herald oil P.J. Watson Patrick Moore Paul Clark peas peer-reviewed papers Peter Foster Peter Schweitzer Phelim McAleer Phil Jones Phil Valentine Phil Watson Piers Corbyn Pointman polar bears polls Popular Technology Pres. Obama propaganda pseudo-science push-polling Quadrant R.G. Dean Real Science reality religion religious freedom religious instruction Richard S. Lindzen Richard Seager rising seas Rob Lyons Robert Kennedy Jr. Robert Matthews Robert W. Wood Roger Beale Roger Harrabin Ross Garnaut Roy W. Spencer ruined world Ruth Bader Ginsburg S. Fred Singer SAH scavenger hunt scepticism School Life 2011 science scientific method Scott Adams Scottish Sceptic settled science Sid Maher sloppy science Socrates Spiked Stanley Pons statistics Stephan Lewandowsky Steve McIntyre Stewart Franks Stuart Rintoul stupidity Sun News supposed sea-rise sustainability swindle Sydney Morning Herald TakingITGlobal Tall Bloke Tasmania Tasmanian Constitution Act 1934 Tasmanian Department of Education Tasmanian schools Terry McCrann The Age The Air Vent The Australian the awarmist journal Nature errs again The Canadian the crazed Bill McKibben The Critical Decade the deceitful John Cook The Drum The Ecologist the Friends of Carbon Dioxide The Garnaut Review The Global Warming Policy Foundation The Globe and Star the Greens The Hockey Shtick the irrational James Hansen The National The Resilient Earth The Skeptic The Telegraph the very silly Tim Flannery This Is Money Throw Them All Out Tim Blair Tim Ellis Tom Mcghie Tom Switzer Tommaso Caccini Tony Abbott topical verse UEA Ullrich Ecker UNFCCC University of Tasmania US Supreme Court USA Today video Vincent Courtillot Waleed Aly water vapour Watts Up With That when theory meets reality Will Steffen William Farr William M. Briggs William McBride William McLennan wind-turbines witches Wynton Hall zombie attacks

Anthropogenic Global Warming: a crippled conjecture
Just as intelligent design is a threshold question between non-science and conjectures, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a threshold question between conjectures and hypotheses. AGW is a centuries-old conjecture elevated to an established belief by a little clique of quacks who proclaim themselves the Consensus on Climate, guardians of the vault of exclusive knowledge. Does this sound familiar? Is the Consensus patterned after the Council of Trent? As a matter of science, as opposed to a matter of belief, the AGW conjecture is gathering more contradictory evidence than supporting. The layman can test it and understand its failings by applying just the few principles outlined [elsewhere in the article].
AGW fails the test because it is proclaimed by a consensus. Science places no value on such a vote. A unanimous opinion, much less a consensus, is insufficient. Science advances one scientist at a time, and we honor their names. It advances one model at a time. When the article gets around to saying “most scientists believe…,” it’s time to go back to the comics section. Science relies instead on models that make factual predictions that are or might be validated.
AGW fails on the first order scientific principles outlined [earlier] because it does not fit all the data. The consensus relies on models initialized after the start of the Industrial era, which then try to trace out a future climate. Science demands that a climate model reproduce the climate data first. These models don’t fit the first-, second-, or third-order events that characterize the history of Earth’s climate. They don’t reproduce the Ice Ages, the Glacial epochs, or even the rather recent Little Ice Age. The models don’t even have characteristics similar to these profound events, much less have the timing right. Since the start of the Industrial era, Earth has been warming in recovery from these three events. The consensus initializes its models to be in equilibrium, not warming. [...]
Anthropogenic Global Warming is a crippled conjecture, doomed just by these principles of science never to advance to a hypothesis. Its fate would be sealed by a minimally scientifically literate public.
—Jeff Glassman, “Conjecture, Hypothesis, Theory, Law: the Basis of Rational Argument”, in The Crossfit Journal 64 (December, 2007).